-
Comparative Study
Comparison between 18F-FDG PET/MRI and MDCT for the assessment of preoperative staging and resectability of gastric cancer.
- Dong Ho Lee, Se Hyung Kim, Ijin Joo, Bo Yun Hur, and Joon Koo Han.
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, South Korea; Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, South Korea.
- Eur J Radiol. 2016 Jun 1; 85 (6): 1085-91.
PurposeTo investigate if 18F-FDG PET/MRI can improve the diagnostic performance of TNM staging and help make an accurate decision for resectability in patients with gastric cancer compared to MDCT.Materials And MethodsForty-two patients with histologically confirmed gastric cancers underwent preoperative MDCT and 18F-FDG PET/MRI. M-staging and resectability was assessed in all patients, and T- and N-staging was evaluated in 30 of 42 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy. Two abdominal radiologists independently assessed their MDCT images and 18F-FDG PET/MRI and determined preoperative TNM staging and resectability of gastric cancers. Diagnostic performance with MDCT and 18F-FDG PET/MRI were compared using McNemar's test and receiver operating characteristic analysis.ResultsDiagnostic accuracies for T and N staging were not significantly different between MDCT and 18F-FDG PET/MRI in both readers. However, 18F-FDG PET/MRI showed significantly improved diagnostic accuracy for M staging in one reader (P=0.008) and marginal improvement in the other reader (P=0.063) compared to MDCT. Regarding the resectability of gastric cancers, diagnostic accuracy (92.9% for both readers) of 18F-FDG PET/MRI was significantly higher than that (76.2% for reader 1 and 64.3% for reader 2) of MDCT in both readers (P<0.05).Conclusion18F-FDG PET/MRI may improve diagnostic accuracy for preoperative M staging as well as resectability of gastric cancers compared to MDCT.Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.