• J Magn Reson Imaging · Feb 2019

    Convolutional Neural Network Using a Breast MRI Tumor Dataset Can Predict Oncotype Dx Recurrence Score.

    • Richard Ha, Peter Chang, Simukayi Mutasa, Jenika Karcich, Sarah Goodman, Elyse Blum, Kevin Kalinsky, Michael Z Liu, and Sachin Jambawalikar.
    • Breast Imaging Section, Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
    • J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Feb 1; 49 (2): 518-524.

    BackgroundOncotype Dx is a validated genetic analysis that provides a recurrence score (RS) to quantitatively predict outcomes in patients who meet the criteria of estrogen receptor positive / human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (ER+/HER2-)/node negative invasive breast carcinoma. Although effective, the test is invasive and expensive, which has motivated this investigation to determine the potential role of radiomics.HypothesisWe hypothesized that convolutional neural network (CNN) can be used to predict Oncotype Dx RS using an MRI dataset.Study TypeInstitutional Review Board (IRB)-approved retrospective study from January 2010 to June 2016.PopulationIn all, 134 patients with ER+/HER2- invasive ductal carcinoma who underwent both breast MRI and Oncotype Dx RS evaluation. Patients were classified into three groups: low risk (group 1, RS <18), intermediate risk (group 2, RS 18-30), and high risk (group 3, RS >30).Field Strength/Sequence1.5T and 3.0T. Breast MRI, T1 postcontrast.AssessmentEach breast tumor underwent 3D segmentation. In all, 1649 volumetric slices in 134 tumors (mean 12.3 slices/tumor) were evaluated. A CNN consisted of four convolutional layers and max-pooling layers. Dropout at 50% was applied to the second to last fully connected layer to prevent overfitting. Three-class prediction (group 1 vs. group 2 vs. group 3) and two-class prediction (group 1 vs. group 2/3) models were performed.Statistical TestsA 5-fold crossvalidation test was performed using 80% training and 20% testing. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) were evaluated.ResultsThe CNN achieved an overall accuracy of 81% (95% confidence interval [CI] ± 4%) in three-class prediction with specificity 90% (95% CI ± 5%), sensitivity 60% (95% CI ± 6%), and the area under the ROC curve was 0.92 (SD, 0.01). The CNN achieved an overall accuracy of 84% (95% CI ± 5%) in two-class prediction with specificity 81% (95% CI ± 4%), sensitivity 87% (95% CI ± 5%), and the area under the ROC curve was 0.92 (SD, 0.01).Data ConclusionIt is feasible for current deep CNN architecture to be trained to predict Oncotype DX RS.Level Of Evidence4 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:518-524.© 2018 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.