• Injury · Sep 2021

    Determination of the radiologic findings for predicting failure of conservative management with observation for blunt renal injury patients: A single-centre experience over 13 years.

    • Kwangmin Kim, Gaesung Ha, Sung Woo Jang, Ji Young Jang, and Keum Seok Bae.
    • Department of Surgery, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea; Trauma Center, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Wonju, Korea.
    • Injury. 2021 Sep 1; 52 (9): 2588-2593.

    PurposeMost blunt renal injuries (BRIs) are managed conservatively without complications. Because conservative management with observation (CMO) is widely conducted, failed CMO is frequent. Clarifying the role and indication of CMO is important to manage BRI patients. Therefore, this study was conducted to analyse factors related to failed CMO.MethodsBRI patients (aged >13 years) who were admitted via the emergency department in Wonju Severance Christian Hospital were analysed retrospectively between January 2008 and July 2020. Patient characteristics, including clinical data, laboratory findings, transfusion requirements, injury grade, initial CT findings, length of hospital stay, intensive care unit stay, and mortality, were investigated for all enrolled patients.ResultsKidney injury grade ≥ 4, perinephric haematoma rim distance (PHD), length of main laceration, intravascular contrast extravasation (ICE), Gerota's fascia discontinuity, multiple lacerations, dissociated renal fragment and complexity of laceration were statistically significantly different between the successful CMO and failed CMO groups in the comparative analysis. The multivariate analysis showed that perinephric haematoma rim distance [odds ratio (OR) 1.44 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09 - 1.90], p = 0.011] and ICE [OR 7.41 (95% CI 2.20 - 24.99), p = 0.001] were mutually independent risk factors associated with failed CMO. When the ROC curve of PHD and ICE was generated to predict the failure of CMO, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.884 (95% CI, 0.826 - 0.942), p < 0.001), and the optimal cut-off value for PHD was 2.9 cm, and for ICE was presence of ICE on CT [sensitivity: 90.5% (95% CI, 0.70 - 0.99), specificity: 78.0% (95% CI, 0.73 - 0.83)].ConclusionPHD and ICE may be useful factors to predict failed CMO for BRI patients. PHD > 2.9 cm and the presence of ICE may indicate who will require invasive procedures. Close observation is wise for patients with these risk factors.Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.