-
J. Thromb. Haemost. · May 2012
Comparative StudyDiagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for an acute pulmonary embolism: results of the 'IRM-EP' study.
- M P Revel, O Sanchez, S Couchon, B Planquette, A Hernigou, R Niarra, G Meyer, and G Chatellier.
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, APHP, Paris, France. marie-pierre.revel@htd.aphp.fr
- J. Thromb. Haemost. 2012 May 1; 10 (5): 743-50.
BackgroundMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has not been validated as an alternative diagnostic test to computed tomography angiography (CTA) in patients with suspicion of a pulmonary embolism (PE).ObjectivesTo evaluate performance of current MRI technology in diagnosing PE, in reference to a 64-detector CTA.Patients/Methods Prospective investigation including 300 patients with a suspected PE, referred for CTA after assessment of clinical probability and D-dimer testing. MRI protocol included unenhanced, perfusion and angiographic sequences. MRI results were interpreted by two independent readers, to evaluate inter-reader agreement. Sensitivity and specificity were evaluated globally and according to PE location and to clinical probability category.ResultsOf 300 enrolled patients, 274 were analyzed and 103 (37.5%) had a PE diagnosed by CTA. For patients with conclusive MRI results (72% for reader 1, 70% for reader 2), sensitivity and specificity were 84.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 74.9-91.4%) and 99.1% (95% CI, 95.1-100.0%), respectively, for reader 1, and 78.7% (95% CI, 68.2-87.1%) and 100% (95% CI, 96.7-100.0%) for reader 2. After exclusion of inconclusive MRI results for both readers, inter-reader agreement was excellent (kappa value: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.88-0.99). Sensitivity was better for proximal (97.7-100%) than for segmental (68.0-91.7%) and sub-segmental (21.4-33.3%) PE (P < 0.0001). Sensitivity was similar for both readers within each clinical probability category.ConclusionsCurrent MRI technology demonstrates high specificity and high sensitivity for proximal PE, but still limited sensitivity for distal PE and 30% of inconclusive results. Although a positive result can aid in clinical decision making, MRI cannot be used as a stand-alone test to exclude PE.© 2012 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.