• Zhuoran Sun, Weishi Li, Yang Guo, Siyu Zhou, Fei Xu, Zhongqiang Chen, Qiang Qi, Zhaoqing Guo, Yan Zeng, and Chuiguo Sun.
• Department of Orthopaedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, P.R.China.
• Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Jul 15; 33 (7): 837-844.

ObjectiveTo analyze the prospective effect of pre-existing spinal stenosis of adjacent segment on the short-term effectiveness after lumbar fusion surgery.MethodsA prospective comparative study was conducted to divide 183 patients with L 4-S 1 lumbar spinal stenosis who met the selection criteria between July 2015 and December 2017 into two groups according to the status of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) judged by preoperative disc degeneration and spinal stenosis. There were 98 patients in group A (no degeneration of adjacent segments before operation) and 85 patients in group B (adjacent segments degenerated before operation). There was no significant difference in gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, body mass index (BMI), combined spondylolisthesis, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score of low back pain and leg pain, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and Oswestry disability index (ODI) score between the two groups ( P>0.05); the age of group A was significantly younger than that of group B ( t=-3.560, P=0.000). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization stay, and perioperative complications were recorded and compared. The VAS score of low back pain and leg pain, JOA score, and ODI score at last follow-up were used to evaluate the effectiveness. The incidence of ASD after operation was compared between the two groups, and logistic regression was used to analyze the independent risk factors affecting the occurrence of ASD after operation.ResultsThere was no significant difference in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and hospitalization stay between the two groups ( P>0.05). The incidence of perioperative complications in groups A and B was 13.3% and 20.0%, respectively, with no significant difference ( χ2=1.506, P=0.220). Two groups of patients were followed up, the follow-up time of groups A and B was (24.9±8.8) months and (24.8±7.8) months, respectively, there was no significant difference ( t=0.050, P=0.960). At last follow-up, no adjacent segment disease was found in either group. There was no significant difference in Pfirrmann grade between the two groups at last follow-up ( P>0.05), and there was significant difference in Pfirrmann grade between the two groups before operation and at last follow-up ( P<0.001). At last follow-up, 21 cases (21.4%) in group A and 53 cases (62.4%) in group B had ASD, with significant difference ( χ2=31.652, P=0.000). The main cause of ASD was the severity of adjacent spinal canal stenosis. The clinical scores of the two groups at last follow-up were significantly improved when compared with those before operation ( P<0.05). The JOA score of group A was significantly higher than that of group B at last follow-up ( P<0.05). In group B, the VAS score of low back pain and ODI score in patients with ASD after operation at last follow-up were significantly higher than those in patients without ASD ( P<0.05). logistic regression analysis showed that preoperative pre-existing degeneration and BMI were independent risk factors for ASD after operation ( P<0.05).ConclusionPre-existing mild spinal stenosis in adjacent segment can significantly affect the effectiveness, and can significantly increase the risk of ASD early after operation. The main pathological type of ASD was the severity of adjacent segment spinal stenosis. For preoperative assessment of pre-existing degeneration, we should evaluate the overall degeneration of the adjacent segment of the spinal canal, rather than simply evaluating the degeneration of the adjacent disc and facet joints.

11 keywords...

hide…