• J Magn Reson Imaging · Mar 2020

    Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Imaging in Differentiation Borderline From Malignant Ovarian Epithelial Tumors: Correlation With Histological Cell Proliferation and Vessel Characteristics.

    • Xiao-Li Song, Lifang Wang, Honghong Ren, Rong Wei, Jia-Liang Ren, and Jinliang Niu.
    • The Radiology Department, Shanxi Medical University Second Affiliated Hospital, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
    • J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 Mar 1; 51 (3): 928-935.

    BackgroundThe differentiation of borderline from malignant ovarian epithelial tumors (OETs) is difficult based on morphologic characteristics. Diffusion and perfusion information from intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) might be useful for this distinction.PurposeTo investigate the potential of IVIM-DWI in discriminating borderline from malignant OETs by correlating with cell proliferation and microvessel density (MVD).Study TypeProspective.SubjectsSixty-six patients with OETs (22 borderline, BOETs; 44 malignant, MOETs) underwent IVIM-DWI before surgery.Field Strength3.0T IVIM-DWI sequence with 12 b-values (0-1000 sec/mm2 ).AssessmentApparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and IVIM-DWI parameters (diffusion coefficient [D], microvascular volume fraction [f], and pseudodiffusion coefficient [D*]) were measured. Cell proliferation and MVD was determined by immunohistochemical staining of Ki-67 and CD-31, respectively.Statistical TestsMann-Whitney U-test; two-sample t-test; intraclass correlation coefficient; Bland-Altman analysis; receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves; and Spearman correlation.ResultsADC and D in BOETs was significantly higher than those in MOETs (P < 0.001), while f in BOETs was significantly lower than those in MOETs (P < 0.001). No significant difference was found in D* between borderline and malignancies (P = 0.324). In the differential diagnosis of borderline from malignant OETs; D demonstrated the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.951, while ADC and f had a lower AUC of 0.921 and 0.847, respectively. The ADC and D was negatively correlated with cell proliferation (r = -0.682, r = -0.694, respectively, P < 0.001), while f was positively correlated with MVD of the OETs (r = 0.558, P < 0.001).Data ConclusionIVIM-DWI may be a useful tool for differentiating BOETs from MOETs. D and f could be image biomarkers to reflect histopathological characteristics of cell proliferation and MVD in OETs.Level Of Evidence1 Technical Efficacy Stage: 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:928-935.© 2019 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.