-
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol · Jan 2011
[A report of an accident investigation commission as evidence in legal proceedings].
- Tadeusz Widła and Marek Leśniak.
- Z Katedry Kryminalistyki Uniwersytetu Slaskiego w Katowicach Katowice.
- Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol. 2011 Jan 1; 61 (1): 70-4.
AbstractIn practice it happens that both a report of an accident investigation commission and court expert's opinions are under consideration during a civil or criminal case. The authors present three groups of problems that are associated with such situations, attempting to provide answers to the problems. The above-mentioned problems may be presented in the following way: may the body of evidence (inside the range of a court case) incorporate expert opinions, which were prepared for an accident investigation commission (if so--may such opinions replace evidence derived from a court expert's opinion); is it legally admissible to use findings of an accident investigation commission as evidential purpose in crime proceedings (if so--what kind of evidence should such findings represent); how should lawyers decide in case of a contradiction between an expert opinion of an accident investigation commission and a court expert's opinion.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*,_underline_or**bold**. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>and subscript<sub>text</sub>. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3., hyphens-or asterisks*. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com) - Images can be included with:
 - For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote..