-
Comparative Study
Acute and subacute intracerebral hemorrhages: comparison of MR imaging at 1.5 and 3.0 T--initial experience.
- Thomas Allkemper, Bernd Tombach, Wolfram Schwindt, Harald Kugel, Matthias Schilling, Otfried Debus, F Möllmann, and Walter Heindel.
- Department of Clinical Radiology, University of Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Strasse 33, 48149 Muenster, Germany. allkemp@uni-muenster.de
- Radiology. 2004 Sep 1; 232 (3): 874-81.
PurposeTo assess and describe the appearance of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) at 3.0-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging as compared with the appearance of this lesion type at 1.5-T MR imaging.Materials And MethodsSixteen patients with 21 parenchymal ICHs were examined. ICHs were classified as hyperacute, acute, early subacute, late subacute, or chronic. Patients underwent 1.5- and 3.0-T MR imaging with T2-weighted fast spin-echo, fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery (FLAIR), and T1-weighted spin-echo (1.5-T) and gradient-echo (3.0-T) sequences within 4 hours of each other. The central (ie, core) and peripheral (ie, body) parts of the ICHs were analyzed quantitatively by using contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) calculations derived from signal intensity (SI) measurements; these values were statistically evaluated by using the Mann-Whitney U test. Two readers qualitatively determined SIs of the cores and bodies of the ICHs, degrees of apparent susceptibility artifacts, and lesion ages. The chi(2) test was used to determine statistically significant differences.ResultsWith the exception of the bodies of late subacute ICHs at 3.0-T T2-weighted imaging, which had increased positive CNRs and SI scores (P =.05), all parts of the ICHs at all stages showed increased negative CNRs and SI scores at 3.0-T FLAIR and T2-weighted imaging, as compared with these values at 1.5 T (P =.05). No significant CNR or SI score differences at any ICH stage were observed between 1.5-T spin-echo and 3.0-T gradient-echo T1-weighted imaging (P >.05). With the exception of minor susceptibility artifacts seen in acute and early subacute ICHs at 3.0-T T1-weighted gradient-echo imaging, no susceptibility artifacts were noticed. The ages of most lesions were identified correctly without significant differences between the two field strengths (P >.05), with the exception of the ages of acute ICHs, which were occasionally misinterpreted as early subacute lesions at 3.0 T.ConclusionAt 3.0 T, all parts of acute and early subacute ICHs had significantly increased hypointensity on FLAIR and T2-weighted MR images as compared with the SIs of these lesions at 1.5 T. However, 1.5- and 3.0-T MR images were equivalent in the determination of acute to late subacute ICHs.Copyright RSNA, 2004
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.