-
- Masatoyo Nakajo, Megumi Jinguji, Masayuki Nakajo, Tetsuya Shinaji, Yoshiaki Nakabeppu, Yoshihiko Fukukura, and Takashi Yoshiura.
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima University, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima, 890-8544, Japan. toyo.nakajo@dolphin.ocn.ne.jp.
- Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017 Dec 1; 42 (12): 2882-2889.
PurposeTo retrospectively investigate the SUV-related and texture parameters individually and in combination for differentiating between F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid benign and metastatic adrenal tumors with PET/CT.MethodsThirteen benign adrenal tumors (BATs) and 22 metastatic adrenal tumors (MATs) with a metabolic tumor volume (MTV) > 10.0 cm3 and SUV ≥ 2.5 were included. SUVmax, MTV, total lesion glycolysis, and four textural parameters [entropy, homogeneity, intensity variability (IV), and size-zone variability] were obtained. These parameters were compared between BATs and MATs using Mann-Whitney U test, and the diagnostic performance was evaluated by the area under the curve (AUC) values derived from the receiver operating characteristic analysis. The diagnostic value of combining SUV and texture parameters was examined using a scoring system.ResultsMATs showed significantly higher SUVmax (p = 0.004), entropy (p = 0.013), IV (p = 0.006), and lower homogeneity (p = 0.019) than BATs. The accuracies for diagnosing MATs were 82.9, 82.9, 85.7, and 71.4% for SUVmax, entropy, IV, and homogeneity, respectively. No significant differences in AUC were found among these parameters (p > 0.05 each). When each parameter was scored as 0 (negative for malignancy) and 1 (positive for malignancy) according to each threshold criterion and the four parameter summed scores 0, 1, and 2 were defined as benignity and 3 and 4 as malignancy, the sensitivity and specificity and accuracy to predict MATs were 100% (22/22), 84.6% (11/13), and 94.3% (33/35), respectively, with 0.97 of the AUC.ConclusionThe combined use of SUVmax and texture parameters has a potential to significantly increase the diagnostic performance to differentiate between large FDG-avid BATs and MATs.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.