• George A C Mendes, Eduardo Pedrolo Silveira, François Caire, Marie-Paule Boncoeur Martel, Suzana Saleme, Christina Iosif, and Charbel Mounayer.
• *Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Hôpital Dupuytren, Centre Regional Hospitalier Universitaire de Limoges, Limoges, France;‡Department of Neurosurgery, Hôpital Dupuytren, Centre Regional Hospitalier Universitaire de Limoges, Limoges, France.
• Neurosurgery. 2016 Jan 1; 78 (1): 34-41.

BackgroundThe management of arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) in the basal ganglia, insula, and thalamus is demanding for all treatment modalities.ObjectiveTo define safety and outcomes of embolization used as a stand-alone therapy for deep-seated AVMs.MethodsA cohort of 22 patients with AVMs located in the basal ganglia, thalamus, and insula who underwent embolization between January 2008 and December 2013.ResultsEighteen of 22 (82%) patients had anatomic exclusion. The mean size was 2.98 ± 1.28 cm, and the mean number of sessions was 2.1 per patient. Most patients presented with hemorrhage (82%, n = 18), and 3 (14%) patients were in a deteriorated neurological status (modified Rankin Scale >2) at presentation. Sixty-eight percent of ruptured AVMs had size ≤3 cm. A single transarterial approach was performed in 9 (41%) cases, double catheterization was used in 4 (18%), and the transvenous approach was required in 8 (36%) cases. Procedure-related complications were registered in 3 (14%) cases. One death was associated with treatment, and complementary radiosurgery was required in 2 (9%) patients.ConclusionEmbolization therapy appears to be safe and potentially curative for certain deep AVMs. Our results demonstrate a high percentage of anatomic obliteration with rates of complications that may approach radiosurgery profile. In particular, embolization as stand-alone therapy is most suitable to deep AVMs with small nidus size (≤3 cm) and/or associated with single venous drainage in which microsurgery might not be indicated.

24 keywords...

hide…