• J Magn Reson Imaging · May 2021

    Retrospective Distortion and Motion Correction for Free-Breathing DW-MRI of the Kidneys Using Dual-Echo EPI and Slice-to-Volume Registration.

    • Jaume Coll-Font, Onur Afacan, Scott Hoge, Harsha Garg, Kumar Shashi, Bahram Marami, Ali Gholipour, Jeanne Chow, Simon Warfield, and Sila Kurugol.
    • Cardiovascular Research Center, Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 149 13th St, Charlestown, United States, 02129, USA.
    • J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021 May 1; 53 (5): 1432-1443.

    BackgroundDiffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) of the kidneys is a technique that provides information about the microstructure of renal tissue without requiring exogenous contrasts such as gadolinium, and it can be used for diagnosis in cases of renal disease and assessing response-to-therapy. However, physiological motion and large geometric distortions due to main B0 field inhomogeneities degrade the image quality, reduce the accuracy of quantitative imaging markers, and impede their subsequent clinical applicability.PurposeTo retrospectively correct for geometric distortion for free-breathing DW-MRI of the kidneys at 3T, in the presence of a nonstatic distortion field due to breathing and bulk motion.Study TypeProspective.SubjectsTen healthy volunteers (ages 29-38, four females).Field Strength/Sequence3T; DW-MR dual-echo echo-planar imaging (EPI) sequence (10 b-values and 17 directions) and a T2 volume.AssessmentThe distortion correction was evaluated subjectively (Likert scale 0-5) and numerically with cross-correlation between the DW images at b = 0 s/mm2 and a T2 volume. The intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) and diffusion tensor (DTI) model-fitting performance was evaluated using the root-mean-squared error (nRMSE) and the coefficient of variation (CV%) of their parameters.Statistical TestsStatistical comparisons were done using Wilcoxon tests.ResultsThe proposed method improved the Likert scores by 1.1 ± 0.8 (P < 0.05), the cross-correlation with the T2 reference image by 0.13 ± 0.05 (P < 0.05), and reduced the nRMSE by 0.13 ± 0.03 (P < 0.05) and 0.23 ± 0.06 (P < 0.05) for IVIM and DTI, respectively. The CV% of the IVIM parameters (slow and fast diffusion, and diffusion fraction for IVIM and mean diffusivity, and fractional anisotropy for DTI) was reduced by 2.26 ± 3.98% (P = 6.971 × 10-2 ), 11.24 ± 26.26% (P = 6.971 × 10-2 ), 4.12 ± 12.91% (P = 0.101), 3.22 ± 0.55% (P < 0.05), and 2.42 ± 1.15% (P < 0.05).Data ConclusionThe results indicate that the proposed Di + MoCo method can effectively correct for time-varying geometric distortions and for misalignments due to breathing motion. Consequently, the image quality and precision of the DW-MRI model parameters improved.Level Of Evidence2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 1.© 2020 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…