-
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatr. · Feb 2010
The Rehabilitation Complexity Scale version 2: a clinimetric evaluation in patients with severe complex neurodisability.
- Lynne Turner-Stokes, Heather Williams, and Richard J Siegert.
- King's College London, School of Medicine, Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, London, UK. lynne.turner-stokes@dial.pipex.com
- J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatr. 2010 Feb 1; 81 (2): 146153146-53.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinimetric properties of the Rehabilitation Complexity Scale (RCS) in a neurorehabilitation inpatient sample.DesignObservational cohort analysis in a tertiary specialist setting.Subjects179 consecutive patients (mean age 44.5 years (SD 15 years), males:females 110:69) with complex neurological disabilities, mainly following acquired brain injury.MethodsRepeat RCS ratings of the level of care, nursing, therapy and medical interventions were examined for dimensionality, repeatability, consistency and responsiveness, and compared with the Northwick Park Nursing and Therapy Dependency Scales, the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and Barthel Index, recorded at the start and end of treatment.ResultsThe test-retest reliability confirmed the RCS to be repeatable (kappa 0.93 to 0.96) and moderately responsive to changes in levels of intervention over the course of the programme, suggesting the need for serial evaluation. Coefficient-alpha was 0.76 and item-total correlations all >0.50, with moderate to high loadings on the first principal component. Factor analysis revealed two clear factors ('Nursing/medical care,' and 'Therapies'). The RCS demonstrated good convergent and discriminant validity with the Northwick Park Nursing and Therapy Dependency Scales but some ceiling effect. FIM motor and Barthel scores correlated well with basic care and nursing scores (Spearman rho -0.65 to -0.79) but less well with therapy (rho -0.26) and medical (rho -0.28 to -0.33) scores.ConclusionIn this cohort, the RCS provided a reliable, valid and moderately responsive profile of rehabilitation interventions, separating into two main subscales. It usefully identified medical and therapy inputs not captured by the FIM and Barthel Index, which are commonly used to define case complexity in rehabilitation.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.