• S Afr J Surg · Jun 1992

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial

    Occlusive versus semi-open dressings in the management of skin graft donor sites.

    • D Demetriades and G Psaras.
    • Department of Surgery, Baragwanath Hospital, Johannesburg.
    • S Afr J Surg. 1992 Jun 1; 30 (2): 40-1.

    AbstractIn a prospective, randomised study we compared the efficacy of a new occlusive dressing (Granuflex-E) with a semi-open dressing (tulle gras) in the management of skin-graft donor sites. The study examined 10 patients with burns, each with two donor sites. Each patient acted as his or her own control. The donor sites were mirror images of each other, the anterior surface of the thighs. One donor site was dressed with Granuflex-E and the other with tulle gras. The sites dressed with the occlusive dressing healed significantly faster and were more comfortable than the sites with the semi-open dressing.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…