• Annals of hematology · Mar 2019

    Comparative Study

    Comparable outcome after haploidentical and HLA-matched allogeneic stem cell transplantation for high-risk acute myeloid leukemia following sequential conditioning-a matched pair analysis.

    • Maximilian Doppelhammer, Alessia Fraccaroli, Dusan Prevalsek, Veit Bücklein, Sarah Häbe, Christoph Schulz, Max Hubmann, Andreas Hausmann, Rainer Claus, Andreas Rank, Christoph Schmid, and Johanna Tischer.
    • Department of Medicine II, Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, Klinikum Augsburg, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Stenglinstr.2, 86156 Augsburg, Munich, Germany. maximilian.doppelhammer@klinikum-augsburg.de.
    • Ann. Hematol. 2019 Mar 1; 98 (3): 753-762.

    AbstractIn acute myeloid leukemia (AML), primary refractory or relapsed disease, secondary AML, and leukemia with unfavorable genetics are considered high-risk AML (hrAML), with allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) representing the standard treatment. Sequential conditioning has been successfully used for SCT in hrAML in HLA-matched transplants, and found its way into HLA-haploidentical SCT (haplo-SCT) later on. Hence, sequential conditioning had become standard for all patients with hrAML in our two centers, regardless of donor type. Thereby, HLA-matched family or unrelated transplants were first/second choice, post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY)-based haplo-SCT was chosen in patients missing matched donors or requiring urgent transplantation. To compare the outcome after HLA-matched and haplo-SCT for hrAML following sequential conditioning, we performed a retrospective, matched-pair comparison, using disease stage, genetic subgroups and age as matching criteria. Thirty-four well-matched pairs were identified. At SCT, patients (median age 54 years) were untreated (9%), had remission (13%), or active disease (78%). Three-year overall and leukemia-free survival (OS/LFS) of the entire cohort was 56 ± 7%/49 ± 7%, without significant differences between donor types (OS after HLA-matched/haplo-SCT 62 ± 10%/52 ± 9% (p = 0.21), LFS 53 ± 10%/46 ± 9% (p = 0.26)). Similarly, the cumulative incidence of relapse, non-relapse-mortality and chronic GvHD, as well as GvHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS), and chronic GvHD-free, relapse-free survival (cGRFS), were comparable. However, a higher incidence of acute GvHD ≥ II° was observed after HLA-matched SCT (15 ± 1% versus 50 ± 2%, p = 0.001). In conclusion, sequential conditioning SCT achieved remarkable results in hrAML, independently from donor type. PTCY-based haplo-SCT produced results that were comparable to HLA-matched SCT and can be used as an alternative option.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…