• Indian J Med Res · Dec 2020

    Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of Burkholderia cepacia complex & Stenotrophomonas maltophilia from North India: Trend over a decade (2007-2016).

    • Shveta Sethi, Megha Sharma, Sunil Kumar, Lipika Singhal, Vikas Gautam, and Pallab Ray.
    • Department of Medical Microbiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, Haryana, India.
    • Indian J Med Res. 2020 Dec 1; 152 (6): 656-661.

    Background & ObjectivesWith increased isolation of Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc) and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia from clinical specimens, knowledge of their antimicrobial susceptibility trend will aid in better patient management. This study provides a comprehensive picture of this trend over a decade.MethodsA retrospective analysis of laboratory records over 10 years for antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of Bcc and S. maltophilia was carried out. The susceptibility pattern to commonly used antimicrobials was determined using disk diffusion and compared at the beginning, mid and end of the study period.ResultsFive hundred and thirty Bcc and 665 S. maltophilia isolated over the past 10 yr were included in the study. Over the years, susceptibility of Bcc for co-trimoxazole varied as 80, 70 and 89 per cent at the beginning, middle and end of the study, respectively. Susceptibility to tetracycline was 43 per cent at the beginning of the study and that to minocycline was 100 per cent mid-study and 74 per cent at the end. Susceptibility to ceftazidime varied as 83, 60 and 65 per cent, respectively, and to meropenem, increased during the first half of the study and decreased in the second half, as 60, 70 and 43 per cent, respectively. Bcc susceptibility to levofloxacin decreased from 84 (in 2014) to 76 per cent (in 2016). S. maltophilia susceptibility to co-trimoxazole varied as 90, 82 and 87 per cent, respectively, whereas that to levofloxacin was 80, 100 and 94 per cent, respectively, during the start, mid and end of the study. Susceptibility to minocycline decreased from 100 per cent mid-study to 96 per cent at the end. Susceptibility of S. maltophilia to ceftazidime increased from 24 (in 2012) to 37 per cent (in 2016). All variations among the three phases of the study were significant for all antimicrobials tested for both the organisms.Interpretation & ConclusionsWhile Bcc showed increased resistance to ceftazidime, meropenem and minocycline, S. maltophilia maintained >80 per cent susceptibility to minocycline, levofloxacin and co-trimoxazole throughout the decade. By 2016, Bcc was most susceptible to co-trimoxazole, whereas S. maltophilia was most susceptible to minocycline and levofloxacin.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.