• Volha Pankevich, Joanna Manton, and Itai Gross.
• Emergency Department, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia.
• Emerg Med Australas. 2022 Apr 1; 34 (2): 164-168.

ObjectiveThe Australasian College for Emergency Medicine identifies five ultrasound applications which the College deem core to the practice of emergency medicine but there is scant information as to the uptake of ultrasound or the qualification of users. This study aims to determine the percentage of ED physicians in one metropolitan area who utilise ultrasound for core diagnostic and procedural applications in participating hospitals and the percentage of users who have been formally assessed in any ultrasound application.MethodsThe EDs of eight major public hospitals in greater metropolitan Brisbane area participated in this audit. Data-collectors at each participating ED approached every senior house officer, registrar and senior medical officer in the department and, after obtaining informed consent, asked the participant six questions pertaining to their use of ultrasound for five core applications and about ultrasound training and recorded the answers without information as to the identity of the participant.Results94.4% of the physicians participated. Of those participating, 90% used ultrasound for venous access, with progressively fewer using E-FAST (69%), AAA (51%), Lung (40%) and BELS (29%) for diagnostic purposes. Ninety-eight percent of participants were in favour of enhanced departmental training. Only 33% of participants had their ultrasound skills assessed by a qualified person for even one application.ConclusionWhile use of ultrasound in some applications is widespread, few users have had their skills assessed. Assessment being a routine part of structured training, it cannot be assumed that these users can competently use ultrasound for procedural or diagnostic applications.© 2021 Australasian College for Emergency Medicine.

13 keywords...

hide…