• Tyler J Albert, Joel Bradley, Helene Starks, Jeff Redinger, Cherinne Arundel, Albertine Beard, Laura Caputo, Jonathan Chun, Craig G Gunderson, Dan Heppe, Anand Jagannath, Kyle Kent, Michael Krug, James Laudate, Vignesh Palaniappan, Amanda Pensiero, Zaven Sargsyan, Emily Sladek, Matthew Tuck, and Paul B Cornia.
• VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA. Tyler.Albert@va.gov.
• J Gen Intern Med. 2022 May 1; 37 (6): 1422-1428.

ImportanceThe COVID-19 pandemic disrupted graduate medical education, compelling training programs to abruptly transition to virtual educational formats despite minimal experience or proficiency. We surveyed residents from a national sample of internal medicine (IM) residency programs to describe their experiences with the transition to virtual morning report (MR), a highly valued core educational conference.ObjectiveAssess resident views about virtual MR content and teaching strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic.DesignAnonymous, web-based survey.ParticipantsResidents from 14 academically affiliated IM residency programs.Main MeasuresThe 25-item survey on virtual MR included questions on demographics; frequency and reason for attending; opinions on who should attend and teach; how the virtual format affects the learning environment; how virtual MR compares to in-person MR with regard to participation, engagement, and overall education; and whether virtual MR should continue after in-person conferences can safely resume. The survey included a combination of Likert-style, multiple option, and open-ended questions.ResultsSix hundred fifteen residents (35%) completed the survey, with a balanced sample of interns (39%), second-year (31%), and third-year (30%) residents. When comparing their overall assessment of in-person and virtual MR formats, 42% of residents preferred in-person, 18% preferred virtual, and 40% felt they were equivalent. Most respondents endorsed better peer-engagement, camaraderie, and group participation with in-person MR. Chat boxes, video participation, audience response systems, and smart boards/tablets enhanced respondents' educational experience during virtual MR. Most respondents (72%) felt that the option of virtual MR should continue when it is safe to resume in-person conferences.ConclusionsVirtual MR was a valued alternative to traditional in-person MR during the COVID-19 pandemic. Residents feel that the virtual platform offers unique educational benefits independent of and in conjunction with in-person conferences. Residents support the integration of a virtual platform into the delivery of MR in the future.© 2021. This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply.

11 keywords...

hide…