• Amy Russell, Jill Fromewick, Brittney Macdonald, Stephen Kimmel, Kara Franke, Kimberly Leach, and Kathy Foley.
• HCA Healthcare, Asheville, North Carolina amy.russell2@hcahealthcare.com.
• Ann Fam Med. 2021 May 1; 19 (3): 217-223.

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to explore family medicine graduates' attitudes and perspectives on modifiable and unmodifiable factors that influenced their scope of practice and career choices. By understanding how these factors intersect to influence desired and actual scope of practice decisions, we hope to inform strategies to address training and health care workforce needs.MethodsDuring 5 focus group discussions, comprised of a total of 32 family physicians who either resided in or attended a residency program in western North Carolina, we explored family physicians' attitudes and perspectives on their desired and actual scope of practice. We used thematic analysis to identify patterns in the qualitative data.ResultsWe created a conceptual framework to understand the complex factors which influence family physicians' scope of practice. Personal factors were found to impact desired scope, while workplace, environmental, and population factors influenced actual scope of practice. Stressors in each of these 4 categories often caused family physicians to narrow their scope of practice. Our study highlights specific supports that, if in place, enable physicians to maintain their desired broad scope of practice.ConclusionsOur study indicates that the national trend toward family physicians narrowing their scope of practice can be addressed by providing specific supports during training, residency, and mid-career. Understanding personal, workplace, environmental, and population factors that influence scope of practice can inform specific interventions that create desirable jobs for family physicians and improve their ability to meet changing population needs.© 2021 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

13 keywords...

hide…