-
- H Rozemond and M J Dobbelaar.
- Tijdschr Diergeneesk. 1983 Oct 15; 108 (20): 795-9.
AbstractThe question whether the editors of scientific journals should apply ethical criteria in addition to scientific and stylistic standards in assessing copy submitted, is discussed. This applies particularly to studies which cannot be justified by arguments that appeal to a large majority. Criticism of the ethical content of a paper may refer to the purpose of the study, the selection and treatment of the experimental subjects and the mode of presentation of the study. The publishing policy of the editors may have an effect on the ethical appreciation of problems arising in the course of their activities. The instruments available to the editors in this case are (1) refusing the paper or (2) accepting the paper with a view to provoking a discussion of the questionable point. The last-named possibility offers the additional advantage that those who are not directly involved will also be able to express an opinion.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.