• J Magn Reson Imaging · Apr 2020

    Test-Retest Reliability of the Brain Metabolites GABA and Glx With JPRESS, PRESS, and MEGA-PRESS MRS Sequences in vivo at 3T.

    • Arwa Baeshen, Patrik O Wyss, Anke Henning, Ruth L O'Gorman, Marco Piccirelli, Spyridon Kollias, and Lars Michels.
    • Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
    • J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 Apr 1; 51 (4): 1181-1191.

    BackgroundThe optimization of magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) sequences allows improved diagnosis and prognosis of neurological and psychological disorders. Thus, to assess the test-retest and intersequence reliability of such MRS sequences in quantifying metabolite concentrations is of clinical relevance.PurposeTo evaluate the test-retest and intersequence reliability of three MRS sequences to estimate GABA and Glx = Glutamine+Glutamate concentrations in the human brain.Study TypeProspective.SubjectsEighteen healthy participants were scanned twice (range: 1 day to 1 week between the two sessions) with identical protocols.Field Strength/Sequence3T using a 32-channel SENSE head coil in the PCC region; PRESS, JPRESS, and MEGA-PRESS sequences.AssessmentMetabolite concentrations were estimated using LCModel (for PRESS and MEGA-PRESS) and ProFit2 (for JPRESS).Statistical TestsThe test-retest reliability was evaluated by Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, Pearson's r correlation coefficients, intraclass-correlation coefficients (ICC), coefficients of variation (CV), and by Bland-Altman (BA) plots. The intersequence reliability was assessed with Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, Pearson's r correlation coefficients, and BA plots.ResultsFor GABA, only the MEGA-PRESS sequence showed a moderate test-retest correlation (r = 0.54, ICC = 0.5, CV = 8.8%) and the BA plots indicated good agreement (P > 0.05) for all sequences. JPRESS provided less precise results and PRESS was insensitive to GABA. For Glx, the r and ICC values for PRESS (r = 0.87, ICC = 0.9, CV = 2.9%) and MEGA-PRESS (r = 0.70, ICC = 0.7, CV = 5.3%) reflect higher correlations, compared with JPRESS (r = 0.39, ICC = 0.4, CV = 20.1%).Data ConclusionMEGA-PRESS and JPRESS are suitable for the reliable detection of GABA, the first being more precise. The three sequences included in the study can measure Glx concentrations.Level Of Evidence2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:1181-1191.© 2019 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.