• Mi Hee Lee, Young Kon Kim, Min Jung Park, Jiyoung Hwang, Seong Hyun Kim, Won Jae Lee, and Dongil Choi.
• Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
• J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Aug 1; 38 (2): 401-10.

PurposeTo compare the image quality between T1 high-resolution isotropic volume examination using the multi-echo Dixon technique (mDixon-eTHRIVE) and that using spectrally adiabatic inversion recovery (SPAIR-eTHRIVE) in gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI, and to evaluate the detectability of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on mDixon-eTHRIVE.Materials And MethodsSeventy patients with 117 HCCs underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI using mDixon-eTHRIVE. All patients also underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI using SPAIR-eTHRIVE (mean interval of 96 days). Two radiologists performed a consensus review of MRIs for image quality, homogeneity of fat suppression, artifact, and anatomic sharpness using a four-point scale. The detectability for HCC with mDixon-eTHRIVE was assessed using alternative-free response receiver operating characteristic.ResultsAll mDixon-eTHRIVE images received higher scores for homogeneity of fat suppression and image quality (P < 0.05) compared with those for SPAIR-eTHRIVE. With respect to artifact and anatomic sharpness, there was no significant difference between two MRIs (P > 0.05). Diagnostic accuracy (Az) and sensitivity for detecting HCCs with mDixon-eTHRIVE images were mean 0.954 and 93.2%, respectively.ConclusionFor gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI, mDixon-eTHRIVE showed improved homogeneity of fat suppression and overall image quality compared with SPAIR-eTHRIVE.Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

31 keywords...

hide…