• Haitham Hamoda, Premila W Ashok, Gillian M M Flett, and Allan Templeton.
• Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Aberdeen, UK.
• BJOG. 2005 Aug 1; 112 (8): 1102-8.

ObjectiveTo assess women's acceptability, the efficacy and side effects of sublingual versus vaginal administration of misoprostol in combination with mifepristone for medical abortion up to 13 weeks of gestation.DesignRandomised controlled trial.SettingAberdeen Royal Infirmary.PopulationWomen undergoing medical abortion under the terms of the 1967 Abortion Act.MethodsMifepristone (200 mg) was given orally followed 36-48 hours later by misoprostol administration (sublingual: 600 microg; vaginal: 800 microg). A second dose of misoprostol 400 microg was given 3 hours later (sublingually or vaginally). Women between 9 and 13 weeks of gestation received a further (third) dose of misoprostol 400 microg (sublingually or vaginally), 3 hours later if abortion had not occurred.Main Outcome MeasuresWomen's acceptability, efficacy of the regimen and side effects experienced.ResultsA total of 340 women were recruited (171 sublingual and 169 vaginal). A total of 70% of women in the sublingual group expressed satisfaction with the route of misoprostol administration; 18% answered 'Don't know' while 12% were dissatisfied, compared with 68%, 28% and 4%, respectively, in the vaginal group (P= 0.02). There was no significant difference in the need for surgical evacuation for women in the sublingual (3/158, 1.9%) and vaginal groups (4/156, 2.6%) (P= 0.70). Women receiving misoprostol sublingually were more likely to experience diarrhoea (P < 0.01), shivering (P < 0.01) and unpleasant mouth taste (P < 0.01).ConclusionsSublingual administration of misoprostol is an effective alternative to vaginal administration for medical abortion up to 13 weeks of gestation. The prevalence of prostaglandin-related side effects, however, was higher with this route of administration.

29 keywords...

hide…