• J Magn Reson Imaging · Mar 2019

    Comparative Study

    Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Synthetic Versus Acquired High b-Value (1500 s/mm2 ) Diffusion-Weighted MRI in Women With Breast Cancers.

    • Jung Hyun Park, YunBo LaB0000-0002-5457-7847Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Nam, Gyeongi-do, Republic of Korea., Mijung Jang, Hye Shin Ahn, Sun Mi Kim, Soo Hyun Lee, Eunyoung Kang, Eun-Kyu Kim, and So Yeon Park.
    • Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Nam, Gyeongi-do, Republic of Korea.
    • J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Mar 1; 49 (3): 857-863.

    BackgroundAcquired high b-value (>1000 s/mm2 ) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) has its strength in lesion detection. However, it is not easily used, due to a lower signal-to-noise ratio, eddy current distortions, and prolonged acquisition times. Synthetic DWI does not have these disadvantages because it is based on indirect acquisition, calculated in a voxel-wise manner.PurposeTo compare the diagnostic performance of synthetic and acquired high b-value (1500 s/mm2 ) DWI in women with breast cancer.Study TypeRetrospective.PopulationA total of 108 patients (median age 49 years [range 32-77]) with 133 breast cancers.Field Strength/Sequence3T, echo-planar imaging.AssessmentThree radiologists independently reviewed image sets of both synthetic (S-b1500) and acquired (A-b1500) high b-value DWI. Malignancy confidence of the lesion was scored using a 6-point Likert-type scale.Statistical TestJack-knife alternative free-response receiver-operating characteristic 1 (JAFROC1) analysis was used. Sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) were compared using generalized estimating equations. An independent t-test was used to compare the confidence. An intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated to compare interobserver agreement.ResultsThe JAFROC1 figures of merit values were 0.816 and 0.808 in S-b1500 and A-b1500, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (P = 0.637). Sensitivity was higher in synthetic than in A-b1500 for readers 2 (P = 0.015) and 3 (P = 0.037). Although sensitivity was higher in S-b1500 than in A-b1500 for reader 1, the difference was not significant (P = 0.487). The PPV of S-b1500 was not significantly different from that of A-b1500 (P = 0.397). The malignancy confidence of true-positive tumors was higher in S-b1500 than in A-b1500 (P = 0.013). Interobserver agreement was good for both sequences.Data ConclusionsThe synthetic high b-value DWI may improve the diagnostic sensitivity for breast cancer detection without affecting PPV compared with acquired high b-value DWI.Level Of Evidence3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:857-863.© 2018 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…