• Academic radiology · May 2017

    Automated "Bone Subtraction" Image Analysis Software Package for Improved and Faster CT Monitoring of Longitudinal Spine Involvement in Patients with Multiple Myeloma.

    • Marius Horger, Hendrick Ditt, Shu Liao, Katja Weisel, Jan Fritz, Wolfgang M Thaiss, Sascha Kaufmann, Konstantin Nikolaou, and Christopher Kloth.
    • Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard-Karls-University, Hoppe-Seyler-Str.3, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
    • Acad Radiol. 2017 May 1; 24 (5): 623-632.

    Rationale And ObjectivesThe study aimed to assess the diagnostic benefit of a novel computed tomography (CT) post-processing software generating subtraction maps of longitudinal non-enhanced CT examinations for monitoring the course of myeloma bone disease in the spine.Materials And MethodsThe local institutional review board approved the retrospective data evaluation. Included were 82 consecutive myeloma patients (46 male; mean age, 65.08 ± 9.76) who underwent 188 repeated whole-body reduced-dose Multislice Detector Computed Tomography (MDCT) at our institution between December 2013 and January 2016. Lytic bone lesions were categorized as new or enlarging versus stable. Bone subtraction maps were read in combination with corresponding 1-mm source images comparing results to those of standard image reading of 5-mm axial and 2-mm multiplanar reformat reconstructions (MPR) scans and hematologic markers, and classified as either progressive disease (PD) or stable disease (SD or remission). The standard of reference was 1-mm axial CT image reading + hematologic response both confirmed at follow-up. For statistical purposes, we subgrouped the hematologic response categories similarly to those applied for CT imaging (progression vs stable/response).ResultsAccording to the standard of reference, 16 patients experienced PD and 66 SD at follow-up. Th sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for axial 5 mm + 2 mm MPR image versus bone subtraction maps in a "lesion-by-lesion" reading were 97.6%, 92.3%, and 97.2% versus 97.8%, 96.7%, and 97.7%, respectively. The use of bone subtraction maps resulted in a change of response classification in 9.7% of the patients (n = 8) versus 5 mm + 2 mm MPR image reading from SD to PD. Bone sclerosis lesions were detected in 52 out of 82 patients (63.4%). The reading time was significantly lower with the software bone subtraction compared to standard reading (P < 0.01) and 1-mm image reading (P < 0.001).ConclusionAccuracy of bone subtraction maps reading for monitoring multiple myeloma is slightly increased over that of conventional axial + MPR image reading and significantly speeds up the reading time.Copyright © 2017 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…