• Jamie L Mouzoon, Allison Lloyd-McLennan, and James P Marcin.
• Department of Pediatrics, University of California, Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California, USA.
• Telemed J E Health. 2020 Jul 1; 26 (7): 955-958.

AbstractIntroduction: This study evaluated general emergency medicine (GEM) physicians' opinions on the barriers, perceptions, and utility of pediatric tele-emergency services, or the use of telemedicine for critically ill children in the emergency department (ED). Methods: Based on previously published surveys, a 27-item survey was created to assess GEM physicians' perspective on tele-emergency services provided by a regional group of pediatric critical care physicians. The survey was distributed to ED medical directors at 15 hospitals who actively participate in tele-emergency services. Results: Twelve of the 15 medical directors responded to the survey (80%). Results demonstrated that GEM physicians consider the pediatric critical care tele-emergency consultations clinically helpful (92%), particularly for the management of patients with respiratory distress, congenital anomalies, and cardiovascular processes. The most common barriers to using tele-emergency services included limited time (42%), integrating new technology and processes in existing workflows (42%), and the lack of clinical utility (42%), particularly for patients with nonacute and/or routine conditions. Lastly, half of GEM physicians felt that families preferred telemedicine to telephone consultations (50%). Conclusion: GEM physicians support the premise that pediatric tele-emergency services help with the clinical management of critically ill children. However, physicians do not consistently believe that tele-emergency services are always clinically necessary and time constraints continue to be a significant barrier. Selected use on specific clinical conditions and improving the integration in workflow processes would help increase the appropriate use of tele-emergency services in the ED.

12 keywords...

hide…