• J Magn Reson Imaging · Jul 2003

    Comparative Study

    Three-dimensional method for comparing in vivo interventional MR images of thermally ablated tissue with tissue response.

    • Michael S Breen, Tanya L Lancaster, Roee S Lazebnik, Sherif G Nour, Jonathan S Lewin, and David L Wilson.
    • Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA.
    • J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003 Jul 1; 18 (1): 90-102.

    PurposeTo investigate the ability of magnetic resonance (MR) to monitor radio-frequency (RF) ablation treatments by comparing MR images of thermal lesions to histologically assayed cellular damage. We developed a new methodology using three-dimensional registration for making spatial correlations.Materials And MethodsA low-field, open MRI system was used to guide an ablation probe into rabbit thigh muscle and acquire MR volumes after ablation. After fixation, we sliced and photographed the tissue at 3-mm intervals, using a specially designed apparatus, to obtain a volume of tissue images. Histologic samples were digitized using a video microscopy system. For our three-dimensional registration method, we used the tissue images as the reference, and registered histology and MR images to them using two different computer alignment steps. First, the MR volume was aligned to the volume of tissue images by registering needle fiducials placed near the tissue of interest. Second, we registered the histology images with the tissue images using a two-dimensional warping technique that aligned internal features and the outside boundary of histology and tissue images.ResultsThe MR and histology images were very well aligned, and registration accuracy, determined from displacement of needle fiducials, was 1.32 +/- 0.39 mm (mean +/- SD), which compared favorably to the MR voxel dimensions (0.70 mm in-plane and 3.0 mm thick). A preliminary comparison of MR and tissue response showed that the region inside the elliptical hyperintense rim in MR closely corresponds to the region of necrosis as established by histology, with a mean absolute distance between MR and histology boundaries of 1.17 mm, slightly smaller than the mean registration error. The MR region slightly overestimated the region of necrosis, with a mean signed distance between boundaries of 0.85 mm.ConclusionOur results suggest that our methodology can be used to achieve three-dimensional registration of histology and in vivo MR images. In MR lesion images, the inner border of the hyperintense region corresponds to the border of irreversible cell damage. This is good evidence that during RF ablation treatments, iMRI lesion images can be used for real-time feedback.Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.