• CMAJ · Nov 2015

    Multicenter Study Observational Study

    Derivation and validation of a clinical decision rule to identify young children with skull fracture following isolated head trauma.

    • Jocelyn Gravel, Serge Gouin, Dominic Chalut, Louis Crevier, Jean-Claude Décarie, Nicolas Elazhary, and Benoît Mâsse.
    • Départements de pédiatrie (Gravel, Gouin), chirurgie (Crevier) and radiologie (Décarie), Centre hospitalier universitaire (CHU) Sainte-Justine, Université de Montréal; Department of Pediatrics (Chalut), Montréal Children's Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Département d'urgence (Elazhary), Hôpital Fleurimont (CHU Sherbrooke), Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Que.; Centre de recherche du CHU Sainte-Justine (Mâsse), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que. graveljocelyn@hotmail.com.
    • CMAJ. 2015 Nov 3;187(16):1202-8.

    BackgroundThere is no clear consensus regarding radiologic evaluation of head trauma in young children without traumatic brain injury. We conducted a study to develop and validate a clinical decision rule to identify skull fracture in young children with head trauma and no immediate need for head tomography.MethodsWe performed a prospective cohort study in 3 tertiary care emergency departments in the province of Quebec. Participants were children less than 2 years old who had a head trauma and were not at high risk of clinically important traumatic brain injury (Glasgow Coma Scale score < 15, altered level of consciousness or palpable skull fracture). The primary outcome was skull fracture. For each participant, the treating physician completed a standardized report form after physical examination and before radiologic evaluation. The decision to order skull radiography was at the physician's discretion. The clinical decision rule was derived using recursive partitioning.ResultsA total of 811 patients (49 with skull fracture) were recruited during the derivation phase. The 2 predictors identified through recursive partitioning were parietal or occipital swelling or hematoma and age less than 2 months. The rule had a sensitivity of 94% (95% confidence interval [CI] 83%-99%) and a specificity of 86% (95% CI 84%-89%) in the derivation phase. During the validation phase, 856 participants (44 with skull fracture) were recruited. The rule had a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 87% during this phase.InterpretationThe clinical decision rule developed in this study identified about 90% of skull fractures among young children with mild head trauma who had no immediate indication for head tomography. Use of the rule would have reduced the number of radiologic evaluations by about 60%.© 2015 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…