-
- C Gait, E J Frew, T P C Martin, S Jowett, and R Irving.
- Health Economics Unit, School of Health and Population Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
- Clin Otolaryngol. 2014 Feb 1; 39 (1): 22-31.
ObjectiveTo undertake a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing conservative management, surgery and radiosurgery for treating small-to-medium (1-20 mm)-sized vestibular schwannomas.DesignModel-based economic evaluation using individual-level data from a Birmingham-based longitudinal patient database and from published sources. Both a decision tree and state-transition (Markov) model were developed, from an National Health Service (NHS) perspective. Sensitivity analyses were also carried out.SettingSecondary care treatment for patients with small-to-medium-sized vestibular schwannomas.ParticipantsThree hypothetical cohorts of adult patients receiving conservative management, radiosurgery or surgery treatment, aged 58 years as starting age within model.Main Outcome MeasuresCost-effectiveness based on cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY).ResultsConservative management is the preferred strategy for the treatment of small-to-medium-sized vestibular schwannomas. Conservative management is both cheaper (-£ 722 and -£ 2764) and more effective (0.136 and 0.554 quality-adjusted life years) than both radiosurgery and surgery, respectively. A conservative strategy can therefore be considered as highly cost-effective. This result is sensitive to the assumed quality-of-life parameters in the model. Sensitivity analysis suggests that the probability of a conservative strategy being the most cost-effective approach compared with surgery and radiosurgery at a willingness to pay of £ 20 000/quality-adjusted life year gained is 80% and 55%, respectively.ConclusionsA conservative approach is the preferred strategy for treatment of small-to-medium vestibular schwannomas. This result is sensitive to quality-of-life values used in the analysis. More research is required to assess the impact of treatment upon patients' health-related quality of life over time.© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.