• Yutaro Hara, Yusuke Hagiwara, and Nobuaki Inoue.
• Department of Pediatric Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tokyo Metropolitan Children's Medical Center.
• Pediatr Int. 2021 May 15.

BackgroundThe present study compared adherence to the fasting-time guidelines of the International Committee for the Advancement of Procedural Sedation (ICAPS) and the North American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) and complication rates in pediatric patients requiring procedure sedation and analgesia during treatment in the emergency room (ER).MethodsThe present, retrospective, single-center study was performed between 2016 and 2020 and enrolled patients who received procedural sedation and analgesia in the ER with the fasting times recommended in the ICAPS and ASA guidelines.ResultsIn total, 857 patients were included. The most frequent indication for procedural sedation and analgesia was fracture reduction in 420 patients (49.0%). Ketamine, the most commonly administered drug, was given to 710 patients (82.8%). Adherence to the ICAPS guidelines was higher (p<0.01), with 772 (95.7%) and 351 (41.0%) patients, respectively, adhering to the ICAPS and ASA recommendations for food and drink fasting times. Complications occurred in 130 patients (15.2%), including SpO2 <90% in 75 patients (8.7%) and vomiting in 20 patients (2.3%). No serious complications, such as aspiration, cardiac arrest or death, occurred. The complication rate between the two groups did not differed significantly with 50 (14.2%) and 127 (15.5%) patients experiencing complications according to the ICAPS and ASA guidelines, respectively (p=0.586).ConclusionThe fasting recommendations of the ICAPS guidelines, which propose risk stratification to determine the appropriate fasting time for procedural sedation and analgesia, are more tolerable to patients and has no apparent difference in the rate of adverse events to ASA guidelines.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

3 keywords...

hide…