• Hippokratia · Jan 2012

    Prognostic analysis of carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater: pancreaticoduodenectomy versus local resection.

    • Jf Feng, Xm Zhou, and Wm Mao.
    • Department of Oncological Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
    • Hippokratia. 2012 Jan 1; 16 (1): 23-8.

    Background And AimPancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is considered to be the optimal treatment for carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater, but the trauma caused by PD is often severe and extensive. Local resection (LR) for ampullary tumors has been performed for a century but remains controversial. The use of this procedure for benign conditions is clear, but its place, if any, in the management of ampullary carcinoma is debated. The aim of this study was to investigate the outcomes and analyse the prognostic factors of LR of carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater by comparison with PD.Patients And MethodsA retrospective analysis of 71 patients of carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater was conducted at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital from January 1995 to December 2005. We investigated the differences of the baseline characteristics and the intra- and postoperative data of patients who underwent PD and LR. Prognostic factors for recurrence and survival of carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater between PD and LR was also analysed.ResultsAmong the 71 patients of ampullary carcinoma who underwent surgical resection, a PD was performed in 46 (64.8%) patients while a LR was performed in 25 (35.2%) patients. The 30-day mortality rate associated with PD (6.5%) was not different from that with LR (0%; p=0.547) while the morbidity following PD (30.4%) and LR (8.0%) was statistically different (p=0.031). The complications were also significantly higher in the PD group than the LR group (34.8% vs 6.5%; p=0.013). In a univariate Cox regression analysis of survival, there were significant differences in tumor size (p=0.031), TNM (Tumor Node Metastasis) stage (p=0.000), pT (pathologic Tumor) stage (p=0.010), pN (pathologic Node) stage (p=0.000), differentiation (p=0.026), and surgical margin (p=0.031). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that TNM stage (HR=3.640, 95% CI 1.428~9.282; p=0.007), pT stage (HR=3.090, 95% CI 1.230~7.762; p=0.016), and pN stage (HR=4.479, 95% CI 1.524~013.161; p=0.005) remained as independent predictors of survival rates. According to the method of Kaplan-Meier, the five-year survival rate in the PD group was 53.5% and that in the LR group was 48.0%, no significant differences were found between the two groups in overall survival rates (p=0.540). Compared with the PD, the 5-year survival of patients with the TNM stage-III/IV who undergoing LR was statistically lower (11.1% vs 38.1%; p=0.040). As expected, the overall survival were signicant differences between the two groups in pT stage-T3/T4 (47.4% vs 18.2%, p=0.018) and pN stage-N1 (36.8% vs 11.1%, p=0.004), respectively. Tumor recurrence was diagnosed in 10/43 (23.3%) patients after PD and 12/25 (48.0%) patients after LR (p=0.035). Logistic regression analysis of recurrence showed that TNM stage-III/IV (p=0.004), pT stage-T3/T4 (p=0.034), and pN stage-N1 (p=0.007) were associated with a 2.444, 1.943, and 2.111-fold increased risk of recurrence, respectively.ConclusionsPD is the preferred operation for carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. LR is less mortal and morbid than PD, which is a suitable treatment in patients with a low-risk cancer in stages I/II or pT1/T2 N0 with a maximum diameter of 2 cm or less. TNM stage, pT stage, and pN stage remained as independent predictors of survival rates.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.