• Antoine Nordez, Erwan Jolivet, Ingrid Südhoff, Dominique Bonneau, Jacques A de Guise, and Wafa Skalli.
• Laboratoire de Biomécanique, AM Paris Tech, CNRS, UMR 8005, Paris, France. antoine.nordez@univ-nantes.fr
• J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 Nov 1; 30 (5): 1116-23.

PurposeTo compare the precision of four methods to estimate the volume of quadriceps muscles using axial MRI.Materials And MethodsEntire legs of 10 healthy young subjects were scanned using a 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging scanner and 4-mm-thick sections without any gaps. Quadriceps muscles were outlined on all of the slices to obtain the MRI reference standard measure of quadriceps muscle volume. This MRI reference standard was compared with the volume estimated using (i) the truncated cone formula, (ii) the Cavalieri method, (iii) a cubic spline interpolation of missing cross sectional areas, and, (iv) the deformation of a parametric specific object. For each method, 3 to 21 slices were used.ResultsThe average volume error was significantly (P < 0.001) different in comparing the four methods (4.4%, 2.3%, 1.1%, and 1.2%, respectively). In addition, the number of slices required to reach a given volume error was significantly (P < 0.001) different across all methods (respectively, 12, 9, 5, and 7 slices required to reach a volume error of 1.1%).ConclusionWhile methods based on interpolation and deformation of a parametric specific object have not been used in literature, these two methods are the most precise approaches to reach a given level of precision.

21 keywords...

hide…