• J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. · Jun 2006

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    Randomized controlled trial of the effects of remote ischemic preconditioning on children undergoing cardiac surgery: first clinical application in humans.

    • Michael M H Cheung, Rajesh K Kharbanda, Igor E Konstantinov, Mikiko Shimizu, Helena Frndova, Jia Li, Helen M Holtby, Peter N Cox, Jeffrey F Smallhorn, Glen S Van Arsdell, and Andrew N Redington.
    • Division of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
    • J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2006 Jun 6;47(11):2277-82.

    ObjectivesWe conducted a randomized controlled trial of the effects of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) in children undergoing repair of congenital heart defects.BackgroundRemote ischemic preconditioning reduces injury caused by ischemia-reperfusion in distant organs. Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is associated with multi-system injury. We hypothesized that RIPC would modulate injury induced by CPB.MethodsChildren undergoing repair of congenital heart defects were randomized to RIPC or control treatment. Remote ischemic preconditioning was induced by four 5-min cycles of lower limb ischemia and reperfusion using a blood pressure cuff. Measurements of lung mechanics, cytokines, and troponin I were made pre- and postoperatively.ResultsThirty-seven patients were studied. There were 20 control patients and 17 patients in the RIPC group. The mean age and weight of the RIPC and control patients were not different (0.9 +/- 0.9 years vs. 2.2 +/- 3.4 years, p = 0.4; and 6.9 +/- 2.9 kg vs. 11.5 +/- 10 kg, p = 0.06). Bypass and cross-clamp times were not different (80 +/- 24 min vs. 88 +/- 25 min, p = 0.3; and 55 +/- 13 min vs. 59 +/- 13 min, p = 0.4). Levels of troponin I postoperatively were greater in the control patients compared with the RIPC group (p = 0.04), indicating greater myocardial injury in control patients. Postoperative inotropic requirement was greater in the control patients compared with RIPC patients at both 3 and 6 h (7.9 +/- 4.7 vs. 10.9 +/- 3.2, p = 0.04; and 7.3 +/- 4.9 vs. 10.8 +/- 3.9, p = 0.03, respectively). The RIPC group had significantly lower airway resistance at 6 h postoperatively (p = 0.009).ConclusionsThis study demonstrates the myocardial protective effects of RIPC using a simple noninvasive technique of four 5-min cycles of lower limb ischemia and reperfusion. These novel data support the need for a larger study of RIPC in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…