• F E Davies, P D Forsyth, A C Rawstron, R G Owen, G Pratt, P A Evans, S J Richards, M Drayson, G M Smith, P J Selby, J A Child, and G J Morgan.
• Academic Department of Haematology and Oncology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS1, UK.
• Br. J. Haematol. 2001 Mar 1; 112 (3): 814-9.

AbstractInitial studies with high-dose therapy (HDT) in myeloma suggest some beneficial effects of attaining a complete response (CR); however, the effect on survival is difficult to assess owing to inconsistencies in the definition of response between studies. We have analysed 96 newly diagnosed patients aged less than 65 years who received HDT and assessed the effect of response on survival using electrophoresis, immunofixation and fluorescent IgH polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to define CR. Patients received induction chemotherapy with C-VAMP (adriamycin, vincristine, methylprednisolone, cyclophosphamide) followed by melphalan 200 mg/m2 and reinfusion of peripheral blood stem cells. There was a high response to C-VAMP [CR = 24%, partial response (PR) = 64%], with all but one patient improving the depth of response after HDT (CR = 69%, PR = 31%). The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were excellent at a median of 46.4 months and 72+ months. There was a trend towards an improved PFS in patients with an immunofixation-negative CR compared with patients with a PR (49.4 months, 41.14 months; P = 0.26). This was not evident when electrophoresis was used to define CR. The method used to define CR did not impact on the overall survival and fluorescent IgH PCR failed to add any additional prognostic information. This study supports the widespread use of the European Bone Marrow Transplantation group (EBMT) response criteria and suggests that immunofixation should be performed on all patients who become electrophoresis negative.

37 keywords...

hide…