• H Schima, M R Müller, S Tsangaris, G Gheiseder, C Schlusche, U Losert, H Thoma, and E Wolner.
• Second Department of Surgery, University of Vienna, Austria.
• Artif Organs. 1993 Mar 1; 17 (3): 164-70.

AbstractBlood has become essential as a test fluid to evaluate hemolysis and biocompatibility of blood pumps in vitro. The blood is usually pumped from a blood bag into a circuit against elevated pressure. A throttle or a length of tubing is used to produce the pressure head. Blood damage caused by the shear stress in these pressure-reducing devices should be minimal. It is not known whether the high but short-lasting shear stress in a throttle is more or less damaging to the blood than the low but long-lasting stress in tubing. In this study, throttles (width 11 mm, minimal height 0.9 mm, length 30 mm; shear stress = 136 N/m2 lasting for 3.23 ms); and tubing (inner diameter 9.5 mm, length 4.5 m, shear stress = 4.5 N/m2 lasting for 3.5 s) were compared at a flow of 5 L/min and a pressure drop of 150 mm Hg. Experiments (n = 10) with bovine blood were performed in two parallel setups using Bio-Medicus pumps BP80. Free hemoglobin in plasma (fHb) and thromboxane B2 (TXB2) were measured. After 6 h, the fHb increase was 31.9 +/- 19.1 mg% for the throttle setup and 32.3 +/- 16.2 for the tubing setup. The TXB2 release was 296 +/- 70 and 305 +/- 54 pg/0.1 ml respectively after 4 h. In summary, no significant differences between the two setups for either fHb or TXB2 could be detected. So the use of a throttle, which requires far less priming volume and a smaller blood-contacting surface while also offering a wider range of adjustment, seems preferable.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

9 keywords...

hide…