• Ian W Pray, Laura Ford, Devlin Cole, Christine Lee, John Paul Bigouette, Glen R Abedi, Dena Bushman, Miranda J Delahoy, Dustin Currie, Blake Cherney, Marie Kirby, Geroncio Fajardo, Motria Caudill, Kimberly Langolf, Juliana Kahrs, Patrick Kelly, Collin Pitts, Ailam Lim, Nicole Aulik, Azaibi Tamin, Jennifer L Harcourt, Krista Queen, Jing Zhang, Brett Whitaker, Hannah Browne, Magdalena Medrzycki, Patricia Shewmaker, Jennifer Folster, Bettina Bankamp, Michael D Bowen, Natalie J Thornburg, Kimberly Goffard, Brandi Limbago, Allen Bateman, Jacqueline E Tate, Douglas Gieryn, Hannah L Kirking, Ryan Westergaard, Marie Killerby, and CDC COVID-19 Surge Laboratory Group.
• MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2021 Jan 1; 69 (5152): 1642-1647.

AbstractAntigen-based tests for SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), are inexpensive and can return results within 15 minutes (1). Antigen tests have received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for use in asymptomatic and symptomatic persons within the first 5-12 days after symptom onset (2). These tests have been used at U.S. colleges and universities and other congregate settings (e.g., nursing homes and correctional and detention facilities), where serial testing of asymptomatic persons might facilitate early case identification (3-5). However, test performance data from symptomatic and asymptomatic persons are limited. This investigation evaluated performance of the Sofia SARS Antigen Fluorescent Immunoassay (FIA) (Quidel Corporation) compared with real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for SARS-CoV-2 detection among asymptomatic and symptomatic persons at two universities in Wisconsin. During September 28-October 9, a total of 1,098 paired nasal swabs were tested using the Sofia SARS Antigen FIA and real-time RT-PCR. Virus culture was attempted on all antigen-positive or real-time RT-PCR-positive specimens. Among 871 (79%) paired swabs from asymptomatic participants, the antigen test sensitivity was 41.2%, specificity was 98.4%, and in this population the estimated positive predictive value (PPV) was 33.3%, and negative predictive value (NPV) was 98.8%. Antigen test performance was improved among 227 (21%) paired swabs from participants who reported one or more symptoms at specimen collection (sensitivity = 80.0%; specificity = 98.9%; PPV = 94.1%; NPV = 95.9%). Virus was isolated from 34 (46.6%) of 73 antigen-positive or real-time RT-PCR-positive nasal swab specimens, including two of 18 that were antigen-negative and real-time RT-PCR-positive (false-negatives). The advantages of antigen tests such as low cost and rapid turnaround might allow for rapid identification of infectious persons. However, these advantages need to be balanced against lower sensitivity and lower PPV, especially among asymptomatic persons. Confirmatory testing with an FDA-authorized nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT), such as RT-PCR, should be considered after negative antigen test results in symptomatic persons, and after positive antigen test results in asymptomatic persons (1).

23 keywords...

hide…