• Borje S Andersson, Marcos de Lima, Peter F Thall, Xuemei Wang, Daniel Couriel, Martin Korbling, Soonja Roberson, Sergio Giralt, Betty Pierre, James A Russell, Elizabeth J Shpall, Roy B Jones, and Richard E Champlin.
• Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 423, Houston, TX 77030-4009, USA. Bandersson@mdanderson.org
• Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008 Jun 1; 14 (6): 672-84.

AbstractWe postulated that fludarabine (Flu) instead of cyclophosphamide (Cy) combined with i.v. busulfan (Bu) as preconditioning for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) would improve safety and retain antileukemic efficacy. Sixty-seven patients received BuCy2, and subsequently, 148 patients received Bu-Flu. We used a Bayesian method to compare outcomes between these nonrandomized patients. The groups had comparable pretreatment characteristics, except that Bu-Flu patients were older (46 versus 39 years, P < .01), more often had unrelated donors (47.3% versus 20.9%, P < .0003), and had shorter median follow-up (39.7 versus 74.6 months). To account for improved supportive care and other unidentified factors that may affect outcome ("period" effects), 78 acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) patients receiving Melphalan-Flu (MF), treated in parallel during this time (1997-2004) were used to estimate the period effect. The MF patients' outcomes worsened during this period. Therefore, the period effect is unlikely to explain the greatly improved outcome with Bu-Flu. Patients transplanted with Bu-Flu in the first complete remission (CR1) had a 3-year overall survival and event-free-survival (EFS) of 78% and 74%, respectively, whereas CR1 patients younger than age 41 had a 3-year EFS of 83%. These results support replacing BuCy +/- ATG with Bu-Flu +/- rabbit-antithymocyte globulin (ATG), and warrant a prospective comparison between allogeneic HSCT and conventional induction/consolidation chemotherapy for AML in CR1.

43 keywords...

hide…