• Tsutomu Tamada, Katsuyoshi Ito, Koji Yoshida, Akihiko Kanki, Atsushi Higaki, Daigo Tanimoto, and Hiroki Higashi.
• Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, 577 Matsushima, Kurashiki city, Okayama, 701-0192, Japan. ttamada@med.kawasaki-m.ac.jp
• Eur J Radiol. 2011 Dec 1; 80 (3): e284-8.

ObjectiveTo compare three different injection methods for optimizing hepatic arterial phase of gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) enhanced MR imaging.MethodsArterial phase images were obtained after the injection of contrast agent at a rate of 3 mL/s with diluted Gd-EOB-DTPA (dilution method) in 27 patients, 3 mL/s with undiluted Gd-EOB-DTPA (3 mL method) in 26 patients and 1 mL/s with undiluted Gd-EOB-DTPA (1 mL method) in 28 patients. In the quantitative evaluation, signal-to-phantom ratios (SPR) of the liver parenchyma, pancreas, renal cortex, portal vein and aorta were evaluated. In the qualitative evaluation, the seven items for image quality of hepatic arterial phase were assessed, and the total score of all items in each subject was calculated.ResultsThe score of enhancement of abdominal aorta and total score of seven items in 1 mL method were significantly higher than those in 3 mL method. The SPR of the liver parenchyma in 3 mL method was significantly higher than that in 1 mL method, suggesting substantial hepatic inflow from portal venous return.ConclusionFor the optimal arterial phase imaging, injection rate of 1 mL/s with undiluted Gd-EOB-DTPA is convenient and preferable, compared with other two methods, based on our qualitative analysis.Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

19 keywords...

hide…