• Leah Frerichs, Mimi Kim, Gaurav Dave, Ann Cheney, Kristen Hassmiller Lich, Jennifer Jones, Tiffany L Young, Crystal W Cene, Deepthi S Varma, Jennifer Schaal, Adina Black, Catherine W Striley, Stefanie Vassar, Greer Sullivan, Linda B Cottler, Arleen Brown, Jessica G Burke, and Giselle Corbie-Smith.
• 1 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
• Health Educ Behav. 2017 Feb 1; 44 (1): 182-191.

AbstractCommunity-academic research partnerships aim to build stakeholder trust in order to improve the reach and translation of health research, but there is limited empirical research regarding effective ways to build trust. This multisite study was launched to identify similarities and differences among stakeholders' perspectives of antecedents to trust in research partnerships. In 2013-2014, we conducted a mixed-methods concept mapping study with participants from three major stakeholder groups who identified and rated the importance of different antecedents of trust on a 5-point Likert-type scale. Study participants were community members ( n = 66), health care providers ( n = 38), and academic researchers ( n = 44). All stakeholder groups rated "authentic communication" and "reciprocal relationships" the highest in importance. Community members rated "communication/methodology to resolve problems" ( M = 4.23, SD = 0.58) significantly higher than academic researchers ( M = 3.87, SD = 0.67) and health care providers ( M = 3.89, SD = 0.62; p < .01) and had different perspectives regarding the importance of issues related to "sustainability." The importance of communication and relationships across stakeholders indicates the importance of colearning processes that involve the exchange of knowledge and skills. The differences uncovered suggest specific areas where attention and skill building may be needed to improve trust within partnerships. More research on how partnerships can improve communication specific to problem solving and sustainability is merited.

13 keywords...

hide…