• Prog Community Health Partnersh · Jan 2012

    Evaluating community-based participatory research to improve community-partnered science and community health.

    • Sarah Hicks, Bonnie Duran, Nina Wallerstein, Magdalena Avila, Lorenda Belone, Julie Lucero, Maya Magarati, Elana Mainer, Diane Martin, Michael Muhammad, John Oetzel, Cynthia Pearson, Puneet Sahota, Vanessa Simonds, Andrew Sussman, Greg Tafoya, and Emily White Hat.
    • National Indian Child Welfare Association, USA.
    • Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2012 Jan 1; 6 (3): 289-99.

    BackgroundSince 2007, the National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) Policy Research Center (PRC) has partnered with the Universities of New Mexico and Washington to study the science of community-based participatory research (CBPR). Our goal is to identify facilitators and barriers to effective community-academic partnerships in American Indian and other communities, which face health disparities.ObjectivesWe have described herein the scientific design of our National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded study (2009-2013) and lessons learned by having a strong community partner leading the research efforts.MethodsThe research team is implementing a mixed-methods study involving a survey of principal investigators (PIs) and partners across the nation and in-depth case studies of CBPR projects.ResultsWe present preliminary findings on methods and measures for community-engaged research and eight lessons learned thus far regarding partnership evaluation, advisory councils, historical trust, research capacity development of community partner, advocacy, honoring each other, messaging, and funding.ConclusionsStudy methodologies and lessons learned can help community-academic research partnerships translate research in communities.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.