• Joy R Goebel, Lynn V Doering, Lorraine S Evangelista, Adeline M Nyamathi, Sally L Maliski, Steven M Asch, Cathy D Sherbourne, Lisa R Shugarman, Andy B Lanto, Angela Cohen, and Karl A Lorenz.
• Department of Nursing, California State University Long Beach (CSULB), Long Beach, CA 90840-0301, USA.
• J. Card. Fail. 2009 Feb 1; 15 (1): 24-30.

BackgroundProgress has been made in addressing pain in specific diseases such as cancer, but less attention has focused on understanding pain in nonmalignant states, including heart failure (HF).Methods And ResultsFrom March 2006 to June 2007, 672 veterans were surveyed and scores for the Brief Pain Inventory, pain distress, clinically significant pain levels (moderate to severe pain), and pain locations were compared using univariate and multivariate models. Fifteen percent of the final sample had HF (95/634). In our study, the HF patients were older (P < .000), reported lower levels of general health (P = .018), had more co-morbidities (P < .000), were more likely to have a history of cancer (P = .035), and suffered more chest pain and fewer headaches (P = .026, P = .03, respectively) than their non-HF cohorts. When controlling for age, co-morbidity and cancer disorders, HF and non-HF patients did not differ in pain severity, interference, distress or locations. Of the patients currently experiencing pain, 67.3% of HF patients and 68.4% of non-HF patients rated their pain as moderate or severe (pain >or=4 on a 0 to 10 scale).ConclusionsAlthough HF has not been identified as a painful condition, this study suggests the burden of pain is significant for both HF and non-HF ambulatory care patients.

32 keywords...

hide…