• J Magn Reson Imaging · May 2007

    Comparative Study

    MRCP imaging at 3.0 T vs. 1.5 T: preliminary experience in healthy volunteers.

    • Hiroyoshi Isoda, Masako Kataoka, Yoji Maetani, Aki Kido, Shigeaki Umeoka, Ken Tamai, Takashi Koyama, Yuji Nakamoto, Yukio Miki, Tsuneo Saga, and Kaori Togashi.
    • Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan. sayuki@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp
    • J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 May 1; 25 (5): 1000-6.

    PurposeTo evaluate the impact of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) imaging at 1.5T and 3.0T on image quality.Materials And MethodsFourteen volunteers were examined at both 1.5T and 3.0T using MRCP imaging performed with a breath-held two-dimensional (2D) half-Fourier acquired single-shot turbo spin-echo (HASTE) thick-slab sequence, a free-breathing navigator-triggered three-dimensional (3D) turbo spin-echo (TSE) sequence with prospective acquisition correction, and a heavily T2-weighted (T2W) sequence with breath-held multislice HASTE. All images were scored for visualization of the biliary and pancreatic ducts, severity of artifacts, image noise, and overall image quality.ResultsMRCP imaging at 3.0T yielded a significant improvement in overall image quality compared to 1.5T. We found a trend for superior visualization of the biliary and pancreatic ducts at 3.0T. Heavily T2W imaging with thin sections (1.4 mm) at 3.0T provided diagnostic images and better visualization of the biliary and pancreatic ducts than heavily T2W imaging with standard sections (2.8 mm) at 3.0T.ConclusionOur experience suggests that MRCP imaging at 3.0T has the potential to provide excellent images. High-resolution heavily T2W imaging with a small voxel size (1.3 x 1.3 x 1.4 mm) at 3.0T can provide diagnostic images and allow evaluation of small pathologies of the bile and pancreatic ducts, which 1.5T MRI cannot sufficiently visualize.(c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.