• Ju Mizuno, Yoshiki Ozawa, Hideko Arita, and Kazuo Hanaoka.
• Department of Anesthesiology, Shonan Atsugi Hospital.
• Masui. 2011 Mar 1; 60 (3): 383-6.

AbstractFor religious reasons, Jehovah's Witnesses do not accept homologous blood transfusions. Instead, they request alternative medical care that does not involve such transfusions. A 58-year-old woman, a Jehovah's Witness, was scheduled for pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic carcinoma under general and epidural anesthesia. She presented with hemoglobin (Hb) concentration of 10.3 g x dl(-1) and hematocrit (Ht) of 31.5% preoperatively. She was fully informed about the risk of cardiac arrest and postoperative complications without blood transfusion, and consented to the bloodless surgery with infusion of colloid solutions; albumin and hydroxyethylated starch, and intraoperative, salvaged, autologous blood transfusion. She submitted a signed letter, absolutely refusing homologous blood transfusion and releasing the hospital from any liability. The general anesthesia was induced using fentanyl, propofol, and vecuronium, and maintained with sevoflurane and vecuronium in combination with epidural anesthesia using lidocaine and fentanyl. An autologous blood transfusion device was prepared for use in the event of massive intraoperative hemorrhage. The pancreaticoduodenectomy and cholecystectomy were performed without the necessity of starting the intraoperative, salvaged, autotransfusion. The volume of intraoperative hemorrhage was 1,108 ml. Lactated Ringer's solution 3,300 ml, physiological saline 200 ml, and hydroxyethylated starch 500 ml were infused during the operation. Although her postoperative Hb and Ht dropped to 8.7 g x dl(-1) and 26.8%, respectively, no transfusion was performed. Anesthesiologists should respect the demands of Jehovah's Witnesses, and should attempt to manage surgery without transfusion.

10 keywords...

hide…