• Jae Woo Shim, Sung Woo Hong, Yong Bok Park, Sang Min Lee, and Jae Chul Yoo.
• 1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
• J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2019 Jan 1; 27 (1): 2309499018821771.

PurposeThe objective of the study is to determine clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic repair for delaminated tears versus non-delaminated tears.MethodsConsecutive 138 patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tear were retrospectively enrolled. They were divided into two groups based on the presence of delamination. All delaminated tears were repaired by en bloc technique (suturing both layers by single stitch). Delaminated tears were categorized into two types: (1) posterior type, delamination involving mainly infraspinatus and (2) complete type, delamination involving both supraspinatus and infraspinatus. Clinical assessments were done using pain visual analog scale (PVAS), functional VAS, American Shoulder Elbow Surgeons score, the Constant score, and range of motion. Postoperative MRI was performed at 6 months after surgery to determine repair integrity.ResultsOf the 138 patients, 78 (56.5%) had delaminated tears, including 30 cases of posterior type and 48 cases of complete type. The retear rate was 6.7% (4/60) in the non-delamination group and 5.1% (4/78) in the delamination group, showing no significant difference between the two groups. There was no significant difference in Sugaya classification between the two groups. Clinical scores were improved significantly in both delamination and non-delamination groups postoperatively, showing no significant difference between the two groups. Delamination subgroup (posterior or complete type) showed no significant correlation with retear rate, Sugaya classification, or clinical outcome.ConclusionsArthroscopic en bloc repair for delaminated rotator cuff tear showed no significant difference in clinical or radiological outcome from that for non-delaminated rotator cuff tear. The extent of delamination did not affect outcome either. Levels of Evidence: Level III, Retrospective comparative study.

26 keywords...

hide…