• D J Buggy, N A Hall, J Shah, J Brown, and J Williams.
• University Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Leicester University, UK.
• Br J Anaesth. 2000 Sep 1;85(3):468-70.

AbstractWe compared patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with ropivacaine alone or combined with fentanyl in terms of analgesic efficacy, motor weakness and side-effects in patients who had received spinal anaesthesia for elective Caesarean section. ASA I patients received combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia and were randomly assigned, in a double-blind study, into two groups after operation: group R (n = 23) received PCEA ropivacaine 0.1%, bolus 5 mg, lock-out 15 min, 3 mg h-1 background infusion, and group RF (n = 24) received PCEA 0.1% ropivacaine/fentanyl 2 micrograms ml-1 at identical settings. Pain and satisfaction on a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) and side-effects were noted. Incidence of motor weakness (Bromage grade 1 or higher) was 48% (11/23) at 8 h in group R compared with 13% (3/24) in group RF (P = 0.025). Pain scores on movement were lower in group RF at 8 and 12 h and at rest at 6 and 8 h (P < 0.05 for each comparison). Analgesic consumption was less in RF (P = 0.041), but there was no difference in time to first request for supplementary analgesia. Patient satisfaction with postoperative analgesia (mean (SD)) was higher in RF (79 (23) vs 57 (29) mm, P = 0.045). Caution should be exercised using ropivacaine PCEA after spinal bupivacaine for Caesarean section, because its reputed motor-sparing property may be unreliable.

31 keywords...

hide…