• Lyndel Bates, Siobhan Allen, and Barry Watson.
• School of Criminology and Criminal Justice and Griffith Criminology Institute, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia; Centre for Accident Research and Road Safety-Queensland (CARRS-Q), Institute for Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. Electronic address: l.bates@griffith.edu.au.
• Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Jul 1; 92: 34-42.

AbstractRoad policing is an important tool used to modify road user behaviour. While other theories, such as deterrence theory, are significant in road policing, there may be a role for using procedural justice as a framework to improve outcomes in common police citizen interactions such as traffic law enforcement. This study, using a sample of 237 young novice drivers, considered how the four elements of procedural justice (voice, neutrality, respect and trustworthiness) were perceived in relation to two forms of speed enforcement: point-to-point (or average) speed and mobile speed cameras. Only neutrality was related to both speed camera types suggesting that it may be possible to influence behaviour by emphasising one or more elements, rather than using all components of procedural justice. This study is important as it indicates that including at least some elements of procedural justice in more automated policing encounters can encourage citizen compliance. Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

16 keywords...

hide…