• D A Deneka, P T Simonian, C J Stankewich, D Eckert, J R Chapman, and A F Tencer.
• Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harborview Biomechanics Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
• J Orthop Trauma. 1997 Jul 1; 11 (5): 337-43.

ObjectivesThe optimal method of internal fixation of basicervical femoral neck fractures is controversial. This area represents a transition zone between the intracapsular femoral neck fracture, usually fixed with multiple cancellous screws, and the extracapsular interochanteric fracture, fixed with a sliding screw device [sliding hip screw (SHS)] and derotation screw (DRS) device. The authors' specific aim was to biomechanically compare these two methods of fixation in a cadaveric model of a basicervical femoral neck fracture with posteromedial comminution.DesignThe authors compared the average peak force during cyclic loading and the maximum axial force sustained by matched pairs of specimens stabilized with either fixation and subjected to axial and torsional loading while flexing and extending the hip. The average peak force was defined as the mean of the peak force values measured in each loading cycle with the maximum displacement of the materials tester actuator the same for each cycle (displacement control) as opposed to the maximum force being held constant (load control).ResultsThe cancellous screw group maintained a significantly lower average peak force, 470 Newtons (SD = 145 Newtons), compared with 868 Newtons (SD = 186 Newtons) for the SHS and DRS composite group (p < 0.01). Similarly, the cancellous screw group demonstrated a lower ultimate load to failure, 1,863 Newtons (SD = 475 Newtons) compared with 3,557 Newtons (SD = 215 Newtons) for the SHS and DRS composite group (p < 0.01).ConclusionThe results support the use of an SHS and DHS composite compared with three cancellous screws in the treatment of unstable basicervical femoral neck fractures.

13 keywords...

hide…