• Hodaka Numasaki, Hitoshi Shibuya, Masamichi Nishio, Hiroshi Ikeda, Kenji Sekiguchi, Norihiko Kamikonya, Masahiko Koizumi, Masao Tago, Yutaka Ando, Nobuhiro Tsukamoto, Atsuro Terahara, Katsumasa Nakamura, Michihide Mitsumori, Tetsuo Nishimura, Masato Hareyama, Teruki Teshima, and Japanese Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Database Committee.
• Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
• Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2012 Jan 1; 82 (1): e111-7.

PurposeTo evaluate the actual work environment of radiation oncologists (ROs) in Japan in terms of working pattern, patient load, and quality of cancer care based on the relative time spent on patient care.Methods And MaterialsIn 2008, the Japanese Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology produced a questionnaire for a national structure survey of radiation oncology in 2007. Data for full-time ROs were crosschecked with data for part-time ROs by using their identification data. Data of 954 ROs were analyzed. The relative practice index for patients was calculated as the relative value of care time per patient on the basis of Japanese Blue Book guidelines (200 patients per RO).ResultsThe working patterns of RO varied widely among facility categories. ROs working mainly at university hospitals treated 189.2 patients per year on average, with those working in university hospitals and their affiliated facilities treating 249.1 and those working in university hospitals only treating 144.0 patients per year on average. The corresponding data were 256.6 for cancer centers and 176.6 for other facilities. Geographically, the mean annual number of patients per RO per quarter was significantly associated with population size, varying from 143.1 to 203.4 (p < 0.0001). There were also significant differences in the average practice index for patients by ROs working mainly in university hospitals between those in main and affiliated facilities (1.07 vs 0.71: p < 0.0001).ConclusionsROs working in university hospitals and their affiliated facilities treated more patients than the other ROs. In terms of patient care time only, the quality of cancer care in affiliated facilities might be worse than that in university hospitals. Under the current national medical system, working patterns of ROs of academic facilities in Japan appear to be problematic for fostering true specialization of radiation oncologists.Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

26 keywords...

hide…