• J. Clin. Oncol. · May 2016

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study

    SIRFLOX: Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing First-Line mFOLFOX6 (Plus or Minus Bevacizumab) Versus mFOLFOX6 (Plus or Minus Bevacizumab) Plus Selective Internal Radiation Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

    • Guy A van Hazel, Volker Heinemann, Navesh K Sharma, FindlayMichael P NMPGuy A. van Hazel, University of Western Australia; Tom Ferguson, Royal Perth Hospital; David Price and Geoff Bower, Mount Medical Center, Perth; Alex Powell, Hollywood Private Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia; Andrew H. Strickland, Jens Ricke, Marc Peeters, David Perez, Bridget A Robinson, Andrew H Strickland, Tom Ferguson, Javier Rodríguez, Hendrik Kröning, Ido Wolf, Vinod Ganju, Euan Walpole, Eveline Boucher, Thomas Tichler, Einat Shacham-Shmueli, Alex Powell, Paul Eliadis, Richard Isaacs, David Price, Fred Moeslein, Julien Taieb, Geoff Bower, Val Gebski, Mark Van Buskirk, David N Cade, Kenneth Thurston, and Peter Gibbs.
    • Guy A. van Hazel, University of Western Australia; Tom Ferguson, Royal Perth Hospital; David Price and Geoff Bower, Mount Medical Center, Perth; Alex Powell, Hollywood Private Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia; Andrew H. Strickland, Monash Medical Centre, Bentleigh, East Victoria; Vinod Ganju, Frankston Private Hospital Peninsula Oncology Centre, Frankston; Peter Gibbs, Western Hospital, Footscray, Victoria; Euan Walpole, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba; Paul Eliadis, Wesley Medical Centre, Milton, Queensland; Val Gebski, NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Camperdown; David N. Cade and Kenneth Thurston, Sirtex Medical Limited, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Volker Heinemann, Ludwig-Maximilian-University of Munich, Munich; Jens Ricke, University Clinic Magdeburg; Hendrik Kroening, Schwerpunktpraxis of Haematology and Oncology, Magdeburg, Germany; Navesh K. Sharma, University of Maryland Medical Center; Fred Moeslein, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Mark Van Buskirk, Data Reduction LLC, Chester, NJ; Michael P.N. Findlay, Cancer Trials New Zealand, Auckland; David Perez, Dunedin Hospital, Dunedin; Bridget A. Robinson, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch; Richard Isaacs, Palmerston North Hospital, Palmerston, New Zealand; Marc Peeters, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium; Javier Rodríguez, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain; Ido Wolf and Einat Shacham-Shmueli, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer; Thomas Tichler, Shaare-Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; Eveline Boucher, Hopital de Jour, Rennes; and Julien Taieb, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris, France. gvh@perthoncology.com.au.
    • J. Clin. Oncol. 2016 May 20; 34 (15): 1723-31.

    PurposeSIRFLOX was a randomized, multicenter trial designed to assess the efficacy and safety of adding selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) using yttrium-90 resin microspheres to standard fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX)-based chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer.Patients And MethodsChemotherapy-naïve patients with liver metastases plus or minus limited extrahepatic metastases were randomly assigned to receive either modified FOLFOX (mFOLFOX6; control) or mFOLFOX6 plus SIRT (SIRT) plus or minus bevacizumab. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) at any site as assessed by independent centralized radiology review blinded to study arm.ResultsBetween October 2006 and April 2013, 530 patients were randomly assigned to treatment (control, 263; SIRT, 267). Median PFS at any site was 10.2 v 10.7 months in control versus SIRT (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.12; P = .43). Median PFS in the liver by competing risk analysis was 12.6 v 20.5 months in control versus SIRT (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.90; P = .002). Objective response rates (ORRs) at any site were similar (68.1% v 76.4% in control v SIRT; P = .113). ORR in the liver was improved with the addition of SIRT (68.8% v 78.7% in control v SIRT; P = .042). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events, including recognized SIRT-related effects, were reported in 73.4% and 85.4% of patients in control versus SIRT.ConclusionThe addition of SIRT to FOLFOX-based first-line chemotherapy in patients with liver-dominant or liver-only metastatic colorectal cancer did not improve PFS at any site but significantly delayed disease progression in the liver. The safety profile was as expected and was consistent with previous studies.© 2016 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.