-
Epilepsy & behavior : E&B · Aug 2017
MEG language lateralization in partial epilepsy using dSPM of auditory event-related fields.
- Manoj Raghavan, Zhimin Li, Chad Carlson, Christopher T Anderson, Jeffrey Stout, David S Sabsevitz, Sara J Swanson, and Jeffrey R Binder.
- Department of Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA. Electronic address: mraghavan@mcw.edu.
- Epilepsy Behav. 2017 Aug 1; 73: 247-255.
ObjectiveMethods employed to determine hemispheric language dominance using magnetoencephalography (MEG) have differed significantly across studies in the choice of language-task, the nature of the physiological response studied, recording hardware, and source modeling methods. Our goal was to determine whether an analysis based on distributed source modeling can replicate the results of prior studies that have used dipole-modeling of event-related fields (ERFs) generated by an auditory word-recognition task to determine language dominance in patients with epilepsy.MethodsWe analyzed data from 45 adult patients with drug-resistant partial epilepsy who performed an auditory word-recognition task during MEG recording and also completed a language fMRI study as part of their evaluation for epilepsy surgery. Source imaging of auditory ERFs was performed using dynamic statistical parametric mapping (dSPM). Language laterality indices (LIs) were calculated for four regions of interest (ROIs) by counting above-threshold activations within a 300-600ms time window after stimulus onset. Language laterality (LL) classifications based on these LIs were compared to the results from fMRI.ResultsThe most lateralized MEG responses to language stimuli were observed in a parietal region that included the angular and supramarginal gyri (AngSmg). In this region, using a half-maximal threshold, source activations were left dominant in 32 (71%) patients, right dominant in 8 (18%), and symmetric in 5 patients (11%). The best agreement between MEG and fMRI on the ternary classification of regional language dominance into left, right, or symmetric groups was also found at the AngSmg ROI (69%). This was followed by the whole-hemisphere and temporal ROIs (both 62%). The frontal ROI showed the least agreement with fMRI (51%). Gross discordances between MEG and FMRI findings were disproportionately of the type where MEG favored atypical right-hemispheric language in a patient with right-hemispheric seizure origin (p<0.05 at three of the four ROIs).SignificanceIn a parietal region that includes the angular and supramarginal gyri, language laterality estimates based on dSPM of ERFs during auditory word-recognition shows a degree of MEG-fMRI concordance that is comparable to previously published estimates for MEG-Wada concordance using dipole counting methods and the same task. Our data also suggest that MEG language laterality estimates based on this task may be influenced by the laterality of epileptic networks in some patients. This has not been reported previously and deserves further study.Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.