• Eur J Radiol · Jan 2010

    High spatial resolution 3D MR cholangiography with high sampling efficiency technique (SPACE): comparison of 3T vs. 1.5T.

    • Shigeki Arizono, Hiroyoshi Isoda, Yoji S Maetani, Yuusuke Hirokawa, Kotaro Shimada, Yuji Nakamoto, Toshiya Shibata, and Kaori Togashi.
    • Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan. arizono@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp
    • Eur J Radiol. 2010 Jan 1; 73 (1): 114-8.

    PurposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate image quality of 3D MR cholangiography (MRC) using high sampling efficiency technique (SPACE) at 3T compared with 1.5T.Methods And MaterialsAn IRB approved prospective study was performed with 17 healthy volunteers using both 3 and 1.5T MR scanners. MRC images were obtained with free-breathing navigator-triggered 3D T2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequence with SPACE (TR, >2700ms; TE, 780ms at 3T and 801ms at 1.5T; echo-train length, 121; voxel size, 1.1mmx1.0mmx0.84mm). The common bile duct (CBD) to liver contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were compared between 3 and 1.5T. A five-point scale was used to compare overall image quality and visualization of the third branches of bile duct (B2, B6, and B8). The depiction of cystic duct insertion and the highest order of bile duct visible were also compared. The results were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test.ResultsCNR between the CBD and liver was significantly higher at 3T than 1.5T (p=0.0006). MRC at 3T showed a significantly higher overall image quality (p=0.0215) and clearer visualization of B2 (p=0.0183) and B6 (p=0.0106) than at 1.5T. In all analyses of duct visibility, 3T showed higher scores than 1.5T.Conclusion3T MRC using SPACE offered better image quality than 1.5T. SPACE technique facilitated high-resolution 3D MRC with excellent image quality at 3T.Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.